Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0894 14
Original file (NR0894 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No.NRO0893-14
21 July 2014

ml
—
SU
ee

This is in reference to your recent Application for Correction
of Naval Record (DD Form 149).

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 July 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with Adil material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory
opinion (A/0) furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo

5420 PERS-306 of 1 May 2014, a copy of which was previously
provided to you on 15 May 2014, and which is now enclosed. You
had 30 days to response ©Oo the A/O, but failed to do so.
Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final
determination.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. in making this determination, the Board
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
conseguentiy, when appl
naval record, the burde

Enclosure

Sincerely,

Rend S TR
a)
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0851 14

    Original file (NR0851 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR03387 13

    Original file (NR03387 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3387 13

    Original file (NR3387 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2685 14

    Original file (NR2685 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0879 14

    Original file (NR0879 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NROO879-14 21 July 2614 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Documentary material considered by *he Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1036 14

    Original file (NR1036 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ~ Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination. Consequently, when applying for @ correction of an official naval record, the purden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error of injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1824 14

    Original file (NR1824 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1323 14

    Original file (NR1323 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the.applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7887 13

    Original file (NR7887 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQOMC Memo 1070 MMRP-13 of 20 May 14, a copy of which is attached. NR7887-13 naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8235 13

    Original file (NR8235 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.